Thing could not be understood that Maqbool Fida Hussain who made naked pictures of Bharat Mata and Maa Saraswati but Why did he not make naked picture of Aeesha, Jeenat, Tabassum though under Urdu literature ten beautiful women of Islam have been mentioned. But M.F. Hussain suffering from the mental disorder and cataract did not find beauty in those ten women, he could behold beauty in Hindu Religion only and he picturized them in Objectionable manner and when time to suffer the consequences cause, he the descendent of Babar left the Country and then he died (superdekhak) in some other country. He left the Country leaving his relative as Amir Khan like Actor and producer whose wife had been under fear after the death of Akhlaque but she was never afraid of killing of Hindus at Kashmir, after Bomb blast at Mumbai, after Terror attack at Akshar dham Mandir, certain such Flim makers produced P.K. and Mohalla Assi Films and by making such films they not only made fun of Hindu gods and deities, custom and Traditions, religious conventions but for hurt of money earning they committed disregard to our Temples, Maths practices as well, when Amir Khan who earned 600 crores of rupees by practicing religious censure when questioned it he had spend just Rs.10/- out of those 600 crore rupees on food, education, employment of children of poor, had no reply. By defamation of our religion they have earned huge money but did nothing for welfare of others with that money. They had no reply. It freedom of expression is in respect of Hindu Religion only? would Amir Khan and others a like him can make a film feature on Mohamad Sahab? would Amir Khan make a film on the love story of Aeesha, Jeenat and Tabassum? No is the reply, as he knows that stories of tolerance of the Religion he belonged to are famous throughout the world? The Terror attack on the office of a magazine of France was seen by the whole world.
When we (H.H.) filed the Petition bearing no. 112/2015 in Delhi High Court against P.K. Movie and challenged the cinematography Act one thing emerged that the cinematography Act can be challenged by a Film Maker only. Common man has no right to challenge a decision of Censor Board and cinematography Act. We submitted before the Court also it in place of god Shiva the god of any other religion had been shown in this manner what would have been the attitude of the Court?
On the manner in which Varansi and Character of Lord Shiva was badly depicted in MohallaAssi and on the language used therein we lodged an FIR No. 783/2015 u/s.295A. 298, 509 IPC with P.S. Farsh Bazar under the order passed by the Hon’ble Court dated 15.09.2013 However there are two types of laws in this Country. One for poor, other for rich. Though it was a cognizable offence nobody has been arrested so far and investigation is still going on in the case.